Linux "git-merge" Command Line Options and Examples
Join two or more development histories together

Incorporates changes from the named commits (since the time their histories diverged from the current branch) into the current branch. This command is used by git pull to incorporate changes from another repository and can be used by hand to merge changes from one branch into another.


Usage:

git merge [-n] [--stat] [--no-commit] [--squash] [--[no-]edit]
[-s ] [-X ] [-S[]]
[--[no-]allow-unrelated-histories]
[--[no-]rerere-autoupdate] [-m ] [...]
git merge --abort
git merge --continue






Command Line Options:

--commit
Perform the merge and commit the result. This option can be used to override --no-commit.With --no-commit perform the merge but pretend the merge failed and do not autocommit, to give the user a chance to inspect andfurther tweak the merge result before committing.
git-merge --commit ...
--edit
Invoke an editor before committing successful mechanical merge to further edit the auto-generated merge message, so that the usercan explain and justify the merge. The --no-edit option can be used to accept the auto-generated message (this is generallydiscouraged). The --edit (or -e) option is still useful if you are giving a draft message with the -m option from the commandline and want to edit it in the editor.Older scripts may depend on the historical behaviour of not allowing the user to edit the merge log message. They will see aneditor opened when they run git merge. To make it easier to adjust such scripts to the updated behaviour, the environmentvariable GIT_MERGE_AUTOEDIT can be set to no at the beginning of them.
git-merge --edit ...
--ff
When the merge resolves as a fast-forward, only update the branch pointer, without creating a merge commit. This is the defaultbehavior.
git-merge --ff ...
--no-ff
Create a merge commit even when the merge resolves as a fast-forward. This is the default behaviour when merging an annotated(and possibly signed) tag that is not stored in its natural place in refs/tags/ hierarchy.
git-merge --no-ff ...
--ff-only
Refuse to merge and exit with a non-zero status unless the current HEAD is already up to date or the merge can be resolved as afast-forward.
git-merge --ff-only ...
-S[<keyid>]
GPG-sign the resulting merge commit. The keyid argument is optional and defaults to the committer identity; if specified, it mustbe stuck to the option without a space.
git-merge -S[<keyid>] ...
--log[
In addition to branch names, populate the log message with one-line descriptions from at most <n> actual commits that are beingmerged. See also git-fmt-merge-msg(1).With --no-log do not list one-line descriptions from the actual commits being merged.
git-merge --log[ ...
--signoff
Add Signed-off-by line by the committer at the end of the commit log message. The meaning of a signoff depends on the project,but it typically certifies that committer has the rights to submit this work under the same license and agrees to a DeveloperCertificate of Origin (see http://developercertificate.org/ for more information).With --no-signoff do not add a Signed-off-by line.
git-merge --signoff ...
--stat
Show a diffstat at the end of the merge. The diffstat is also controlled by the configuration option merge.stat.With -n or --no-stat do not show a diffstat at the end of the merge.
git-merge --stat ...
--squash
Produce the working tree and index state as if a real merge happened (except for the merge information), but do not actually makea commit, move the HEAD, or record $GIT_DIR/MERGE_HEAD (to cause the next git commit command to create a merge commit). Thisallows you to create a single commit on top of the current branch whose effect is the same as merging another branch (or more incase of an octopus).With --no-squash perform the merge and commit the result. This option can be used to override --squash.
git-merge --squash ...
-s
Use the given merge strategy; can be supplied more than once to specify them in the order they should be tried. If there is no -soption, a built-in list of strategies is used instead (git merge-recursive when merging a single head, git merge-octopusotherwise).
git-merge -s ...
-X
Pass merge strategy specific option through to the merge strategy.
git-merge -X ...
--verify-signatures
Verify that the tip commit of the side branch being merged is signed with a valid key, i.e. a key that has a valid uid: in thedefault trust model, this means the signing key has been signed by a trusted key. If the tip commit of the side branch is notsigned with a valid key, the merge is aborted.
git-merge --verify-signatures ...
--summary
Synonyms to --stat and --no-stat; these are deprecated and will be removed in the future.
git-merge --summary ...
-q
Operate quietly. Implies --no-progress.
git-merge -q ...
--progress
Turn progress on/off explicitly. If neither is specified, progress is shown if standard error is connected to a terminal. Notethat not all merge strategies may support progress reporting.
git-merge --progress ...
--allow-unrelated-histories
By default, git merge command refuses to merge histories that do not share a common ancestor. This option can be used to overridethis safety when merging histories of two projects that started their lives independently. As that is a very rare occasion, noconfiguration variable to enable this by default exists and will not be added.
git-merge --allow-unrelated-histories ...
-m
Set the commit message to be used for the merge commit (in case one is created).If --log is specified, a shortlog of the commits being merged will be appended to the specified message.The git fmt-merge-msg command can be used to give a good default for automated git merge invocations. The automated message caninclude the branch description.
git-merge -m ...
--[no-]rerere-autoupdate
Allow the rerere mechanism to update the index with the result of auto-conflict resolution if possible.
git-merge --[no-]rerere-autoupdate ...
--abort
Abort the current conflict resolution process, and try to reconstruct the pre-merge state.If there were uncommitted worktree changes present when the merge started, git merge --abort will in some cases be unable toreconstruct these changes. It is therefore recommended to always commit or stash your changes before running git merge.git merge --abort is equivalent to git reset --merge when MERGE_HEAD is present.
git-merge --abort ...
--continue
After a git merge stops due to conflicts you can conclude the merge by running git merge --continue (see "HOW TO RESOLVECONFLICTS" section below).<commit>...Commits, usually other branch heads, to merge into our branch. Specifying more than one commit will create a merge with more thantwo parents (affectionately called an Octopus merge).If no commit is given from the command line, merge the remote-tracking branches that the current branch is configured to use asits upstream. See also the configuration section of this manual page.When FETCH_HEAD (and no other commit) is specified, the branches recorded in the .git/FETCH_HEAD file by the previous invocationof git fetch for merging are merged to the current branch.PRE-MERGE CHECKSBefore applying outside changes, you should get your own work in good shape and committed locally, so it will not be clobbered ifthere are conflicts. See also git-stash(1). git pull and git merge will stop without doing anything when local uncommitted changesoverlap with files that git pull/git merge may need to update.To avoid recording unrelated changes in the merge commit, git pull and git merge will also abort if there are any changes registeredin the index relative to the HEAD commit. (One exception is when the changed index entries are in the state that would result fromthe merge already.)If all named commits are already ancestors of HEAD, git merge will exit early with the message "Already up to date."FAST-FORWARD MERGEOften the current branch head is an ancestor of the named commit. This is the most common case especially when invoked from git pull:you are tracking an upstream repository, you have committed no local changes, and now you want to update to a newer upstreamrevision. In this case, a new commit is not needed to store the combined history; instead, the HEAD (along with the index) is updatedto point at the named commit, without creating an extra merge commit.This behavior can be suppressed with the --no-ff option.TRUE MERGEExcept in a fast-forward merge (see above), the branches to be merged must be tied together by a merge commit that has both of themas its parents.A merged version reconciling the changes from all branches to be merged is committed, and your HEAD, index, and working tree areupdated to it. It is possible to have modifications in the working tree as long as they do not overlap; the update will preservethem.When it is not obvious how to reconcile the changes, the following happens:1. The HEAD pointer stays the same.2. The MERGE_HEAD ref is set to point to the other branch head.3. Paths that merged cleanly are updated both in the index file and in your working tree.4. For conflicting paths, the index file records up to three versions: stage 1 stores the version from the common ancestor, stage 2from HEAD, and stage 3 from MERGE_HEAD (you can inspect the stages with git ls-files -u). The working tree files contain theresult of the "merge" program; i.e. 3-way merge results with familiar conflict markers <<< === >>>.5. No other changes are made. In particular, the local modifications you had before you started merge will stay the same and theindex entries for them stay as they were, i.e. matching HEAD.If you tried a merge which resulted in complex conflicts and want to start over, you can recover with git merge --abort.MERGING TAGWhen merging an annotated (and possibly signed) tag, Git always creates a merge commit even if a fast-forward merge is possible, andthe commit message template is prepared with the tag message. Additionally, if the tag is signed, the signature check is reported asa comment in the message template. See also git-tag(1).When you want to just integrate with the work leading to the commit that happens to be tagged, e.g. synchronizing with an upstreamrelease point, you may not want to make an unnecessary merge commit.In such a case, you can "unwrap" the tag yourself before feeding it to git merge, or pass --ff-only when you do not have any work onyour own. e.g.git fetch origingit merge v1.2.3^0git merge --ff-only v1.2.3HOW CONFLICTS ARE PRESENTEDDuring a merge, the working tree files are updated to reflect the result of the merge. Among the changes made to the commonancestor’s version, non-overlapping ones (that is, you changed an area of the file while the other side left that area intact, orvice versa) are incorporated in the final result verbatim. When both sides made changes to the same area, however, Git cannotrandomly pick one side over the other, and asks you to resolve it by leaving what both sides did to that area.By default, Git uses the same style as the one used by the "merge" program from the RCS suite to present such a conflicted hunk, likethis:Here are lines that are either unchanged from the commonancestor, or cleanly resolved because only one side changed.<<<<<<< yours:sample.txtConflict resolution is hard;let's go shopping.=======Git makes conflict resolution easy.>>>>>>> theirs:sample.txtAnd here is another line that is cleanly resolved or unmodified.The area where a pair of conflicting changes happened is marked with markers <<<<<<<, =======, and >>>>>>>. The part before the======= is typically your side, and the part afterwards is typically their side.The default format does not show what the original said in the conflicting area. You cannot tell how many lines are deleted andreplaced with Barbie’s remark on your side. The only thing you can tell is that your side wants to say it is hard and you’d prefer togo shopping, while the other side wants to claim it is easy.An alternative style can be used by setting the "merge.conflictStyle" configuration variable to "diff3". In "diff3" style, the aboveconflict may look like this:Here are lines that are either unchanged from the commonancestor, or cleanly resolved because only one side changed.<<<<<<< yours:sample.txtConflict resolution is hard;let's go shopping.|||||||Conflict resolution is hard.=======Git makes conflict resolution easy.>>>>>>> theirs:sample.txtAnd here is another line that is cleanly resolved or unmodified.In addition to the <<<<<<<, =======, and >>>>>>> markers, it uses another ||||||| marker that is followed by the original text. Youcan tell that the original just stated a fact, and your side simply gave in to that statement and gave up, while the other side triedto have a more positive attitude. You can sometimes come up with a better resolution by viewing the original.HOW TO RESOLVE CONFLICTSAfter seeing a conflict, you can do two things:· Decide not to merge. The only clean-ups you need are to reset the index file to the HEAD commit to reverse 2. and to clean upworking tree changes made by 2. and 3.; git merge --abort can be used for this.· Resolve the conflicts. Git will mark the conflicts in the working tree. Edit the files into shape and git add them to the index.Use git commit or git merge --continue to seal the deal. The latter command checks whether there is a (interrupted) merge inprogress before calling git commit.You can work through the conflict with a number of tools:· Use a mergetool. git mergetool to launch a graphical mergetool which will work you through the merge.· Look at the diffs. git diff will show a three-way diff, highlighting changes from both the HEAD and MERGE_HEAD versions.· Look at the diffs from each branch. git log --merge -p <path> will show diffs first for the HEAD version and then the MERGE_HEADversion.· Look at the originals. git show :1:filename shows the common ancestor, git show :2:filename shows the HEAD version, and git show:3:filename shows the MERGE_HEAD version.EXAMPLES· Merge branches fixes and enhancements on top of the current branch, making an octopus merge:$ git merge fixes enhancements· Merge branch obsolete into the current branch, using ours merge strategy:$ git merge -s ours obsolete· Merge branch maint into the current branch, but do not make a new commit automatically:$ git merge --no-commit maintThis can be used when you want to include further changes to the merge, or want to write your own merge commit message.You should refrain from abusing this option to sneak substantial changes into a merge commit. Small fixups like bumpingrelease/version name would be acceptable.MERGE STRATEGIESThe merge mechanism (git merge and git pull commands) allows the backend merge strategies to be chosen with -s option. Somestrategies can also take their own options, which can be passed by giving -X<option> arguments to git merge and/or git pull.resolveThis can only resolve two heads (i.e. the current branch and another branch you pulled from) using a 3-way merge algorithm. Ittries to carefully detect criss-cross merge ambiguities and is considered generally safe and fast.recursiveThis can only resolve two heads using a 3-way merge algorithm. When there is more than one common ancestor that can be used for
git-merge --continue ...
--ignore-cr-at-eol.
· If their version only introduces whitespace changes to a line, our version is used;· If our version introduces whitespace changes but their version includes a substantial change, their version is used;· Otherwise, the merge proceeds in the usual way.renormalizeThis runs a virtual check-out and check-in of all three stages of a file when resolving a three-way merge. This option ismeant to be used when merging branches with different clean filters or end-of-line normalization rules. See "Merging brancheswith differing checkin/checkout attributes" in gitattributes(5) for details.no-renormalizeDisables the renormalize option. This overrides the merge.renormalize configuration variable.no-renamesTurn off rename detection. See also git-diff(1) --no-renames.find-renames[=<n>]Turn on rename detection, optionally setting the similarity threshold. This is the default. See also git-diff(1)
git-merge --ignore-cr-at-eol. ...
--find-renames.
rename-threshold=<n>Deprecated synonym for find-renames=<n>.subtree[=<path>]This option is a more advanced form of subtree strategy, where the strategy makes a guess on how two trees must be shifted tomatch with each other when merging. Instead, the specified path is prefixed (or stripped from the beginning) to make theshape of two trees to match.octopusThis resolves cases with more than two heads, but refuses to do a complex merge that needs manual resolution. It is primarilymeant to be used for bundling topic branch heads together. This is the default merge strategy when pulling or merging more thanone branch.oursThis resolves any number of heads, but the resulting tree of the merge is always that of the current branch head, effectivelyignoring all changes from all other branches. It is meant to be used to supersede old development history of side branches. Notethat this is different from the -Xours option to the recursive merge strategy.subtreeThis is a modified recursive strategy. When merging trees A and B, if B corresponds to a subtree of A, B is first adjusted tomatch the tree structure of A, instead of reading the trees at the same level. This adjustment is also done to the commonancestor tree.With the strategies that use 3-way merge (including the default, recursive), if a change is made on both branches, but later revertedon one of the branches, that change will be present in the merged result; some people find this behavior confusing. It occurs becauseonly the heads and the merge base are considered when performing a merge, not the individual commits. The merge algorithm thereforeconsiders the reverted change as no change at all, and substitutes the changed version instead.CONFIGURATIONmerge.conflictStyleSpecify the style in which conflicted hunks are written out to working tree files upon merge. The default is "merge", which showsa <<<<<<< conflict marker, changes made by one side, a ======= marker, changes made by the other side, and then a >>>>>>> marker.An alternate style, "diff3", adds a ||||||| marker and the original text before the ======= marker.merge.defaultToUpstreamIf merge is called without any commit argument, merge the upstream branches configured for the current branch by using their lastobserved values stored in their remote-tracking branches. The values of the branch.<current branch>.merge that name the branchesat the remote named by branch.<current branch>.remote are consulted, and then they are mapped via remote.<remote>.fetch to theircorresponding remote-tracking branches, and the tips of these tracking branches are merged.merge.ffBy default, Git does not create an extra merge commit when merging a commit that is a descendant of the current commit. Instead,the tip of the current branch is fast-forwarded. When set to false, this variable tells Git to create an extra merge commit insuch a case (equivalent to giving the --no-ff option from the command line). When set to only, only such fast-forward merges areallowed (equivalent to giving the --ff-only option from the command line).merge.verifySignaturesIf true, this is equivalent to the --verify-signatures command line option. See git-merge(1) for details.merge.branchdescIn addition to branch names, populate the log message with the branch description text associated with them. Defaults to false.merge.logIn addition to branch names, populate the log message with at most the specified number of one-line descriptions from the actualcommits that are being merged. Defaults to false, and true is a synonym for 20.merge.renameLimitThe number of files to consider when performing rename detection during a merge; if not specified, defaults to the value ofdiff.renameLimit.merge.renormalizeTell Git that canonical representation of files in the repository has changed over time (e.g. earlier commits record text fileswith CRLF line endings, but recent ones use LF line endings). In such a repository, Git can convert the data recorded in commitsto a canonical form before performing a merge to reduce unnecessary conflicts. For more information, see section "Mergingbranches with differing checkin/checkout attributes" in gitattributes(5).merge.statWhether to print the diffstat between ORIG_HEAD and the merge result at the end of the merge. True by default.merge.toolControls which merge tool is used by git-mergetool(1). The list below shows the valid built-in values. Any other value is treatedas a custom merge tool and requires that a corresponding mergetool.<tool>.cmd variable is defined.· araxis· bc· bc3· codecompare· deltawalker· diffmerge· diffuse· ecmerge· emerge· examdiff· gvimdiff· gvimdiff2· gvimdiff3· kdiff3· meld· opendiff· p4merge· tkdiff· tortoisemerge· vimdiff· vimdiff2· vimdiff3· winmerge· xxdiffmerge.verbosityControls the amount of output shown by the recursive merge strategy. Level 0 outputs nothing except a final error message ifconflicts were detected. Level 1 outputs only conflicts, 2 outputs conflicts and file changes. Level 5 and above outputsdebugging information. The default is level 2. Can be overridden by the GIT_MERGE_VERBOSITY environment variable.merge.<driver>.nameDefines a human-readable name for a custom low-level merge driver. See gitattributes(5) for details.merge.<driver>.driverDefines the command that implements a custom low-level merge driver. See gitattributes(5) for details.merge.<driver>.recursiveNames a low-level merge driver to be used when performing an internal merge between common ancestors. See gitattributes(5) fordetails.branch.<name>.mergeOptionsSets default options for merging into branch <name>. The syntax and supported options are the same as those of git merge, butoption values containing whitespace characters are currently not supported.
git-merge --find-renames. ...